South Sudan vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
South Sudan
0 t
in 2024
Uruguay
0 t
in 2024
South Sudan rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- South Sudan
- Uruguay
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Uruguay, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uruguay ahead.
South Sudan ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.33 t | 0 t | 71.33 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 t | 114.57 t | 114.57 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, South Sudan or Uruguay?
- South Sudan, at 0 t against 0 t in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between South Sudan and Uruguay?
- 0 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- South Sudan ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.