Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Sri Lanka
0 t
in 2024
Uruguay
0 t
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Uruguay, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,331 t | 4,478 t | 2,853 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 1,134 t | 2,255 t | 1,121 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 114.57 t | 114.57 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 t against 0 t in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Sri Lanka ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.