Suriname vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues
Suriname
0 t
in 2024
Tunisia
0 t
in 2024
Suriname rank
34th
Tunisia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Suriname
- Tunisia
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.
Suriname ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 902.55 t | 1,110 t | 207.43 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 43.01 t | 85.91 t | 42.9 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 573.35 t | 573.35 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 114.68 t | 114.68 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues, Suriname or Tunisia?
- Suriname, at 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues between Suriname and Tunisia?
- 0 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Suriname ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.