China vs Latvia: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita
China
0 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0 t per person
in 2024
China rank
30th
Latvia rank
31st
Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | China |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | China |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | China |
| 2020s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), China or Latvia?
- China, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between China and Latvia?
- 0 t per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
- China ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.