Eswatini vs South Sudan: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita
Eswatini
0 t per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 t per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
31st
South Sudan rank
31st
Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita over time
- Eswatini
- South Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0008 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Eswatini or South Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 0 t per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and South Sudan rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
- Eswatini ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.