Japan vs South Sudan: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita
Japan
0 t per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 t per person
in 2024
Japan rank
31st
South Sudan rank
31st
Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita over time
- Japan
- South Sudan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Japan or South Sudan?
- Japan, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Japan and South Sudan?
- 0 t per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Japan and South Sudan rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
- Japan ranks 31st and South Sudan ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.