Latvia vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita
Latvia
0 t per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0 t per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
31st
Rwanda rank
31st
Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … capita over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 31st and Rwanda ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
- Latvia ranks 31st and Rwanda ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.