Libya vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … square

Libya
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
32nd
New Zealand rank
32nd

Closed shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned) … square over time

  • Libya
  • New Zealand
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01199020062023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 32nd and New Zealand ranks 32nd of 186 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre —
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Libya or New Zealand?
Libya, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Libya and New Zealand?
0 t per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for closed shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Libya ranks 32nd and New Zealand ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/libya/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/libya/new-zealand/">Libya vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,213 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Closed shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.