China, Hong Kong SAR vs Libya: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Libya
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
29th
Libya rank
29th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Libya
-2000200400600199119962001

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Libya, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Libya ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 29th and Libya ranks 29th of 154 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 6.2 % change on previous year 73.87 % change on previous year 67.67 % change on previous year Libya
2000s -94.44 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 5.56 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Libya?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Libya as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Libya?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Libya?
10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Libya rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 29th and Libya ranks 29th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Libya: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/libya/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Libya: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 3,563 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.