China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Malawi
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
29th
Malawi rank
29th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Malawi
-2000200400600800199120062021

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malawi ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 29th of 154 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 6.2 % change on previous year 50.47 % change on previous year 44.27 % change on previous year Malawi
2000s -97.22 % change on previous year 74.14 % change on previous year 171.36 % change on previous year Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Malawi?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Malawi?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Malawi?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 29th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/malawi/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 3,563 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.