Congo vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Congo
100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-19.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
12th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-2000200400600199120072024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 100 % change on previous year against -19.01 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 119.01 % change on previous year.

That makes Congo's figure about 5.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Congo ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 154 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 68.66 % change on previous year 8.92 % change on previous year 59.74 % change on previous year Congo
2000s -1.71 % change on previous year 0.9032 % change on previous year 2.61 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 60.18 % change on previous year 1.41 % change on previous year 58.77 % change on previous year Congo
2020s 53.33 % change on previous year -7.43 % change on previous year 60.76 % change on previous year Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Congo or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Congo, at 100 % change on previous year against -19.01 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Congo and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
119.01 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Congo and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Congo vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 3,563 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.