Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Ecuador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Zimbabwe
-84.05 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
26th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 15.95 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 22.43 % change on previous year -5.83 % change on previous year 28.26 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s -96.24 % change on previous year -13.48 % change on previous year 82.75 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s -100 % change on previous year -15.58 % change on previous year 84.42 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
15.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
17 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 3,563 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.