El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
El Salvador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Zimbabwe
-84.05 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- El Salvador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in El Salvador, a difference of 15.95 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
El Salvador ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 15.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1998.
- How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- El Salvador ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.