Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Madagascar: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-59.95 % change on previous year
in 2024
Madagascar
-60.6 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
18th
Madagascar rank
21st

Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Madagascar
-1000100200199120072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports -59.95 % change on previous year against -60.6 % change on previous year in Madagascar, a difference of 0.65 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Madagascar ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Madagascar ranks 21st of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 17.81 % change on previous year -0.2683 % change on previous year 18.07 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s -10.05 % change on previous year 26.45 % change on previous year 36.5 % change on previous year Madagascar
2010s -1.74 % change on previous year -0.3104 % change on previous year 1.43 % change on previous year Madagascar
2020s -17.67 % change on previous year -12.46 % change on previous year 5.21 % change on previous year Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Madagascar?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at -59.95 % change on previous year against -60.6 % change on previous year in Madagascar as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Madagascar?
0.65 % change on previous year, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Madagascar?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Madagascar rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Madagascar ranks 21st of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Madagascar: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/madagascar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Madagascar: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 3,563 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.