What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Mauritania and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Turks and Caicos Islands?

6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritania vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Mauritania

-100 % change on previous year

in 2001

Turks and Caicos Islands

-100 % change on previous year

in 2010

Mauritania rank

29th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

29th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

Mauritania
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Mauritania ranks 29th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 29th of 154 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Mauritania or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Mauritania, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Mauritania and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
How do Mauritania and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?: Mauritania ranks 29th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 29th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/mauritania/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/mauritania/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Mauritania vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 3,563 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.