Nepal vs Norway: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Nepal
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Nepal rank
29th
Norway rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Nepal
- Norway
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.
Nepal ranks 29th and Norway ranks 29th of 154 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74.58 % change on previous year | 75 % change on previous year | 0.4224 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 2000s | -96.97 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 46.97 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Nepal or Norway?
- Nepal, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2010.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Nepal and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
- How do Nepal and Norway rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- Nepal ranks 29th and Norway ranks 29th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.