New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Zimbabwe
-84.05 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
26th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 15.95 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 18.92 % change on previous year -5.83 % change on previous year 24.75 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s -95.29 % change on previous year 5.37 % change on previous year 100.66 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s -100 % change on previous year 91.14 % change on previous year 191.14 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -100 % change on previous year 286.31 % change on previous year 386.31 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
15.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
New Caledonia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 3,563 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.