Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Russian Federation
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-84.05 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Russian Federation
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Russian Federation, a difference of 15.95 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 126.62 % change on previous year | -7.5 % change on previous year | 134.12 % change on previous year | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 52.71 % change on previous year | -3.01 % change on previous year | 55.72 % change on previous year | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 46.19 % change on previous year | 12.63 % change on previous year | 33.56 % change on previous year | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | -26.72 % change on previous year | 65.32 % change on previous year | 92.04 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Russian Federation or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -84.05 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Russian Federation as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
- 15.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- Russian Federation ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.