Armenia vs Belarus: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Armenia
0 kt
in 2024
Belarus
0 kt
in 2024
Armenia rank
34th
Belarus rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Armenia
- Belarus
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 34th and Belarus ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0054 kt | 0.0048 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Armenia or Belarus?
- Armenia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Armenia and Belarus?
- 0 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 34th and Belarus ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.