Armenia vs Cuba: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Armenia
0 kt
in 2024
Cuba
0 kt
in 2024
Armenia rank
34th
Cuba rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Armenia
- Cuba
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 34th and Cuba ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0216 kt | 0.021 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0055 kt | 0.0055 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Armenia or Cuba?
- Armenia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Armenia and Cuba?
- 0 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Cuba?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Cuba rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 34th and Cuba ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.