Armenia vs El Salvador: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Armenia
0 kt
in 2024
El Salvador
0 kt
in 2024
Armenia rank
34th
El Salvador rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Armenia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in El Salvador, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
Armenia ranks 34th and El Salvador ranks 34th of 219 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0007 kt | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0012 kt | 0.0012 kt | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Armenia or El Salvador?
- Armenia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Armenia and El Salvador?
- 0 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and El Salvador?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and El Salvador rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 34th and El Salvador ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.