Armenia vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Armenia
0 kt
in 2024
New Zealand
0 kt
in 2024
Armenia rank
34th
New Zealand rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Armenia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in New Zealand, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 219 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0007 kt | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0005 kt | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Armenia or New Zealand?
- Armenia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Armenia and New Zealand?
- 0 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and New Zealand?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and New Zealand rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.