Australia vs OECD: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Australia
18.89 kt
in 2024
OECD
20.32 kt
in 2024
Australia rank
2nd
OECD rank
1st
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Australia
- OECD
How they compare
OECD currently reports 20.32 kt against 18.89 kt in Australia, a difference of 1.43 kt.
That makes OECD's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 2nd and OECD ranks 1st of 219 countries.
OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | OECD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46.78 kt | 54.05 kt | 7.27 kt | OECD |
| 2000s | 88.54 kt | 93.94 kt | 5.4 kt | OECD |
| 2010s | 68.34 kt | 70.49 kt | 2.15 kt | OECD |
| 2020s | 40.37 kt | 42.7 kt | 2.33 kt | OECD |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Australia or OECD?
- OECD, at 20.32 kt against 18.89 kt in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Australia and OECD?
- 1.43 kt, with OECD ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and OECD?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Australia and OECD rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Australia ranks 2nd and OECD ranks 1st of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.