Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Bahamas
0 kt
in 2024
Costa Rica
0 kt
in 2024
Bahamas rank
34th
Costa Rica rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Bahamas
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 34th and Costa Rica ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0132 kt | 0.0015 kt | 0.0116 kt | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 0.0037 kt | 0.0012 kt | 0.0024 kt | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 0.0006 kt | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Bahamas or Costa Rica?
- Bahamas, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Bahamas and Costa Rica?
- 0 kt, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Costa Rica?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Costa Rica rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Bahamas ranks 34th and Costa Rica ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.