Bahamas vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Bahamas
0 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
Bahamas rank
34th
Rwanda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Bahamas
- Rwanda
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0132 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0112 kt | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 0.0037 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0032 kt | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 0.0006 kt | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Bahamas or Rwanda?
- Bahamas, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Bahamas and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Bahamas ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.