Bangladesh vs Estonia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Bangladesh
0 kt
in 2024
Estonia
0 kt
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
34th
Estonia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Bangladesh
- Estonia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Estonia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 34th and Estonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0013 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.001 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Bangladesh or Estonia?
- Bangladesh, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Bangladesh and Estonia?
- 0 kt, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Estonia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Bangladesh ranks 34th and Estonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.