Belarus vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Belarus
0 kt
in 2024
Eswatini
0 kt
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Eswatini rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Belarus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0054 kt | 0.022 kt | 0.0166 kt | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0188 kt | 0.0185 kt | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0038 kt | 0.0038 kt | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Belarus or Eswatini?
- Belarus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Belarus and Eswatini?
- 0 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.