Belarus vs Mauritania: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Belarus
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritania
0 kt
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Mauritania rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Mauritania
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mauritania ahead.
Belarus ranks 34th and Mauritania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0054 kt | 0.0062 kt | 0.0008 kt | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0002 kt | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Belarus or Mauritania?
- Belarus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Belarus and Mauritania?
- 0 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mauritania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Mauritania rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Mauritania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.