Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Burkina Faso
0 kt
in 2024
Eswatini
0 kt
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Eswatini rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Burkina Faso
- Eswatini
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8477 kt | 0.02 kt | 0.8276 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0.1792 kt | 0.0188 kt | 0.1604 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0038 kt | 0.0038 kt | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Burkina Faso or Eswatini?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
- 0 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.