Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Burkina Faso
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Latvia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Burkina Faso
- Latvia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8262 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.8256 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0.1792 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.1792 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Burkina Faso or Latvia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.