Canada vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Canada
0 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
Canada rank
34th
Rwanda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Canada
- Rwanda
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1148 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.1129 kt | Canada |
| 2000s | 0.0159 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0155 kt | Canada |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Canada |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Canada or Rwanda?
- Canada, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Canada and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Canada ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.