China, Hong Kong SAR vs Gambia: Closed shrubland — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Gambia
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
34th
Gambia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Gambia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Gambia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Gambia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0013 kt | 0.259 kt | 0.2577 kt | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.042 kt | 0.0419 kt | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Gambia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Gambia?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Gambia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Gambia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Gambia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.