China, Hong Kong SAR vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Emissions

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
34th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
34th

Closed shrubland — Emissions over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0010.0020.003199020072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 34th of 219 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0012 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0002 kt Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt
2020s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Turks and Caicos Islands?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Turks and Caicos Islands?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/turks-and-caicos-islands/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.