Costa Rica vs Finland: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Costa Rica
0 kt
in 2024
Finland
0 kt
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
34th
Finland rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Costa Rica
- Finland
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Finland, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 34th and Finland ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.0007 kt | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.001 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Costa Rica or Finland?
- Costa Rica, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Costa Rica and Finland?
- 0 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Finland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Finland rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 34th and Finland ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.