Costa Rica vs Libya: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Costa Rica
0 kt
in 2024
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
34th
Libya rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Costa Rica
- Libya
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0002 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0012 kt | 0 kt | 0.0012 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Costa Rica or Libya?
- Costa Rica, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Costa Rica and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Libya rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.