Costa Rica vs Mauritania: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Costa Rica
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritania
0 kt
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
34th
Mauritania rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Costa Rica
- Mauritania
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritania ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 34th and Mauritania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0062 kt | 0.0046 kt | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0007 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Costa Rica or Mauritania?
- Costa Rica, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Costa Rica and Mauritania?
- 0 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mauritania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Mauritania rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 34th and Mauritania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.