Cuba vs Libya: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Cuba
0 kt
in 2024
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Cuba rank
34th
Libya rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Libya
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 213 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0187 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0173 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0055 kt | 0 kt | 0.0055 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Cuba or Libya?
- Cuba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Cuba and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Libya rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.