Cuba vs New Caledonia: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Cuba
0 kt
in 2024
New Caledonia
0 kt
in 2024
Cuba rank
34th
New Caledonia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 34th and New Caledonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0187 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0174 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0055 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.0044 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0001 kt | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Cuba or New Caledonia?
- Cuba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Cuba and New Caledonia?
- 0 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Caledonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and New Caledonia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 34th and New Caledonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.