Ecuador vs Pakistan: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Ecuador
0.0013 kt
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0013 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
29th
Pakistan rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Pakistan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0013 kt against 0.0013 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Pakistan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 29th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0073 kt | 0.0616 kt | 0.0543 kt | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.0048 kt | 0.0109 kt | 0.0062 kt | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0004 kt | 0 kt | 0.0004 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Ecuador or Pakistan?
- Ecuador, at 0.0013 kt against 0.0013 kt in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 29th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.