Eritrea vs Serbia and Montenegro: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Eritrea
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Eritrea rank
34th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Eritrea
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0101 kt | 0.0026 kt | 0.0075 kt | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0032 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0027 kt | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Eritrea or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Eritrea and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Eritrea and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Eritrea ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.