Eritrea vs South Sudan: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Eritrea
0 kt
in 2024
South Sudan
0 kt
in 2024
Eritrea rank
34th
South Sudan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Eritrea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 34th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Eritrea or South Sudan?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt against 0 kt in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 0 kt, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and South Sudan rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Eritrea ranks 34th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.