Estonia vs Mauritania: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Estonia
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritania
0 kt
in 2024
Estonia rank
34th
Mauritania rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Estonia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 34th and Mauritania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0062 kt | 0.0059 kt | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Estonia or Mauritania?
- Estonia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Estonia and Mauritania?
- 0 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Mauritania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Mauritania rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Estonia ranks 34th and Mauritania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.