Fiji vs Latvia: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Fiji
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Fiji rank
34th
Latvia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Fiji
- Latvia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0006 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Fiji or Latvia?
- Fiji, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Fiji and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Latvia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Fiji ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.