Grenada vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Grenada
0 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
Grenada rank
34th
Rwanda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Grenada
- Rwanda
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 213 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0019 kt | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0004 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Grenada or Rwanda?
- Grenada, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Grenada and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Grenada ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.