Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Nicaragua: Closed shrubland — Emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.7 kt
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.1458 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Nicaragua rank
15th

Closed shrubland — Emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Nicaragua
010203040199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.7 kt against 0.1458 kt in Nicaragua, a difference of 1.55 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 11.7 times Nicaragua's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Nicaragua ranks 15th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 22.08 kt 0.045 kt 22.04 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 14.65 kt 0.0583 kt 14.59 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 8.14 kt 0.0298 kt 8.11 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 2.11 kt 0.0437 kt 2.06 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Nicaragua?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.7 kt against 0.1458 kt in Nicaragua as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nicaragua?
1.55 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nicaragua?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nicaragua rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Nicaragua ranks 15th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Nicaragua: Closed shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/nicaragua/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Nicaragua: Closed shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.