Latvia vs New Caledonia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
New Caledonia
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia rank
34th
New Caledonia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Latvia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Latvia ranks 34th and New Caledonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0015 kt | 0.0009 kt | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.001 kt | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0004 kt | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Latvia or New Caledonia?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and New Caledonia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 34th and New Caledonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.