Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4)
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Sierra Leone
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia rank
34th
Sierra Leone rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Latvia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 34th and Sierra Leone ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0137 kt | 0.0132 kt | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Latvia or Sierra Leone?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sierra Leone as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Sierra Leone rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 34th and Sierra Leone ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.