Latvia vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Emissions
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Emissions over time
- Latvia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0118 kt | 0.0112 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0052 kt | 0.0051 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions, Latvia or Uruguay?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions between Latvia and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.