Libya vs Lithuania: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Lithuania
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
36th
Lithuania rank
36th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Lithuania
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 235 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0016 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0015 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Libya or Lithuania?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Libya and Lithuania?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Lithuania rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.