Libya vs Mongolia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Mongolia
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
36th
Mongolia rank
36th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Mongolia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 36th and Mongolia ranks 36th of 235 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 kt | 0.1599 kt | 0.1586 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0131 kt | 0.0131 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Libya or Mongolia?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Libya and Mongolia?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mongolia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Mongolia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 36th and Mongolia ranks 36th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.